References

1. St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v S [1998] 3WLR 936, 950E per Judge LJ.

2. Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC789, 857 per Lord Keith of Kinkel.

3. Ibid. per Lord Goff of Chieveley, 864.

4. Ibid. per Lord Browne-Wilkinson, 882.

5. Ibid. per Lord Mustill, 891.

6. S. v McC and M; W v W [1972] AC 24 per Lord Reid, 43.

7. St George's Healthcare NHS Trust case [ibid.], 951G.

8. General Medical Council. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. The General Medical Council, London, UK, 1998.

9. St George's Healthcare NHS Trust case [ibid], 969C.

11. Sidaway v Board of Governors of the BethlemRoyal andMaudsley Hospitals [1985] AC 871; [1985] 1 AllER 643.

12. Rogers v Whitaker [1992] 175 CLR 479; [1992] AMLD 6993; 16 BMLR, 148 (Australian High Court).

13. Canterbury v Spence [1972] 464 F2d 772 (US App DC).

14. Reibl v Hughes 114 DLR 3d 1 (Canadian Supreme Court 1980); [1980] 2 SCR 880.

15. Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232 ; [1998] 1 Lloyd's Rep. Med. 26.

17. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 AllER 118; [1957] 1 WLR 582.

18. Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority [1984] AC 112.

19. General Medical Council. Making and using visual and audio recordings of patients. General Medical Council, London, UK, 2002.

20. Extract from the Hippocratic Oath. 5th century bc.

21. Extract from The Declaration of Geneva. World Medical Association, 1948, restated 1983.

22. Extract from The International Code of Medical Ethics. World Medical Association, Geneva, Switzerland, 1983.

23. General Medical Council. Good medical practice. General Medical Council, London, UK, 2001.

24. General Medical Council. Confidentiality. General Medical Council, London, 2000.

25. Association of Police Surgeons and British Medical Association. Revised interim guidelines on confidentiality for police surgeons in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Association of Police Surgeons (now the Association of Forensic Physicians), East Kilbride. British Medical Association, London, UK, 1998.

26. Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California [1976] P 551 2d 334 (Cal. Sup. Ct. 1976).

27. W v Egdell [1990] Ch. 359 ; [1990] 1 All ER 835 .

28. National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd. ("The Ikarian Reefer"); (The Times, March 5, 1993); [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 68 (High Court 1993); [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 455 (CA 1995).

29. Expert Witness Institute. Newsletter. EWI, London, UK, 1998.

30. Whitehouse v Jordan [1981] 1WLR 246, 256 per Lord Wilberforce.

31. Polivitte Ltd v Commercial Union Assurance Co. [1987] plc 1 Lloyd's Rep. 379, 386 per Garland J.

32. Derby & Co. Ltd. and Others v Weldon and Others (No. 9) The Times, November 9, 1990 per Staughton LJ.

33. Expert Witness Institute.

34. Civil Procedure Rules. The Stationery Office, London, 1999; and on the Department of Constitutional Affairs (formerly Lord Chancellor's Department). Available at Website: (www.dca.gov/uk).

35. Re N [1999] Lloyds Law Reports (Medical) 257; [1999] EWCA Civ 1452.

Beat The Battle With The Bottle

Beat The Battle With The Bottle

Alcoholism is something that can't be formed in easy terms. Alcoholism as a whole refers to the circumstance whereby there's an obsession in man to keep ingesting beverages with alcohol content which is injurious to health. The circumstance of alcoholism doesn't let the person addicted have any command over ingestion despite being cognizant of the damaging consequences ensuing from it.

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment